Methodology

Turn “that sounds impressive”
into “I can check the source.”

This is not a wealth ranking or a final verdict on anyone. It is a research workflow that starts with public interviews and separates stories into evidence layers.

01

Collect public interviews

Build an episode index and keep the original video as the primary source. The public site does not redistribute full transcripts.

02

Extract people and claims

Find names, companies, amounts, starting points, and turning points while keeping the episode ID attached.

03

Label the research depth

FULL has independent outside sources; WIKI has a basic external profile; LITE is an interview excerpt.

04

Show conflicts, do not average them

When interview claims, reporting, and company records disagree, each stays visible instead of becoming one falsely precise answer.

Evidence labels

Three evidence levels. Three ways to read.

FULL · Deeply sourced

Independent profiles, biographical context, and clickable sources. Start here.

WIKI · External profile

Basic outside context is present, but not every business claim has been independently verified.

LITE · Interview excerpt

Mostly auto-transcript and interview context. Useful for leads, not sufficient as standalone evidence.

What we explicitly do not do